Against Sentimentalism

Heed these proclamations and beckon to the horn, war looms over the horizon; the strong to inherit this world once more, upon the solar altar of triumph, upon the throne of might once more, the masses crushed beneath your heel, become as the mighty Caesar's of yore.

Human equality and comradery cannot extend any further than beyond that of the sheep being feasted upon by the wolf, all things must compete, power is taken and we must be cruel and cunning if we are to be masters rather than slaves, sentimentality should not extend beyond the family. Egalitarianism by nature is like that of bearing your neck openly to the sword of your foe. Many a coward will call these ideas vulgar, primitive and savage; what is more vulgar however is the naive, deplorable assertion of equality among men that makes up the fundamentals in modern morality, to accompany this is the pipe-dream to bestow love and good will upon one another. Despite living in an age that values supposed logic and reason the zealousness of which humans defend these "ideals" is with base fanaticism of the most vile of forms, what makes this situation even more of interest is the fact that still we have no evidence, philosophical, scientific or metaphysical to re-enforce such vague but universally accepted assumptions. Equality, if looked at from a purely logical perspective is easily seen as a great fallacy, one of which that is bulwarked merely by sentimentalism and solicitous thinking, a way to elevate the slave to stand hand in hand with his conqueror.

A lot of this slavish mentality has been imbedded in Western thought for thousands of years, submission, tolerance, peace all culminating in the eventual decline of humanity as a whole, regardless of their history they are still foreign, Semitic religions have always been alien in nature to all they’ve imposed upon. Through this cowardice indoctrinated from birth humans have no true understanding or appreciation for the self and self thought. Altruism and egalitarianism are forced upon the masses to the point of which they will defend these principles with blind rage and ignorance; we live in a world ever working towards the death of distinction and merit, self worth and excellence. Day by day we give over ourselves even more to the plague of mediocrity and it has worked itself into our roots like a parasite, one of which cannot be killed without much pain but acceptance is a far worse fate than action. Democracy spread itself the same as Christianity, by appealing to the weak masses with promises of acceptance and tolerance for their meekness and by bribing the supposed nobles and elites with wealth and power. The underlying factor of all egalitarian doctrines, and in my opinion the most obvious reason to oppose them is the undying support of the masses, their love for themselves expounded upon ignoble and puerile worldviews, something that the masses can relate to is something to be avoided. Ask yourself this, “what does the majority mean to us?” Seek the answer inside, in your true nature rather than the one imposed artificially. Why should democracy rule when the majority of people are unable to control themselves? There may be the delusion of strength in numbers, and it may hold true in a vulgar , but what is there to give merit to? What pride can any man give to himself when he leeches of the great or is lost among the many?

Scholars write of universal suffrage, humanism/human rights, ethics, philosophy; scholars write but rarely do they think. What do they have to teach us of this world? Are we not literate already? Long have we tired from their repetitions, their assertions and rhetoric. What do they offer today other than scripted symbols on parchment? Their thoughts already spoken a thousand times prior and their opinions on them explained to them and indoctrinated into them since childhood so that genuine thought no longer becomes a required ability. Do they not have thoughts of their own to meet us with? Is there anything they can offer? Espouse substance and sense rather than quotes accompanied by empty adjectives and metaphors? Those who write so lavishly do so to hide their childish naivety, their literal discomfort with reality and their lack of comprehension of nature, in reality they fear and know that they have nothing of merit to offer. They are born of slaves and crusade for the indoctrination of the next generation with institutionalised degeneracy, stupidity and sentimentalism. We must deny any such "progress" if we are to avoid being crushed under the heel of the masses, our minds cannot be dulled with meek enlightenment from these foolish men and their most deplorable women.

Who better than to have the interest of equality of humans than those at the bottom? These ideas have always been put forth by the weaker individuals, the weaker racers and the weaker nations, any example of a strong figure saying otherwise can be comfortably branded a hypocrite in more ways than one. The world doesn’t work off books and ethics, or human thought, it is driven by a primordial and metaphysical power beyond the reach of our science and religions, try as we might it cannot be explained, nor can it be ignored, those who know the truth accept these facts, those who are too weak too will dispute it with hysterics. We must meet their prayers, their scriptures and their chattering with fist and sword as is the nature of this world, these wretches and their gospel of mediocrity must be abated.

What I offer is indeed barbaric, it is cruel and indeed I hold what would be deemed "inhumane" values, "humane" however in today’s description is a complete fallacy, I defend the most virile of truths, the primeval instinct of man, of nature itself, school books and doctrines cannot destroy what comes so natural, what comes supra-natural to us, what is civilisation today but the meek wallowing in a cesspit of oblivion and ignorance? Why is the true nature of man met with such revilement as of today? What position holds the most honour, the conqueror or the cowering weakling?